What is accessible and inclusive citizen engagement?

Accessible and inclusive citizen engagement means that all people, including those with disabilities, can fully engage in public life. This includes the right to information, freedom of expression, the right to vote and the opportunity to contribute to collective decisions. To achieve this goal, communities must implement concrete actions, such as involving persons with disabilities and their associations, organizing accessible consultations and using appropriate tools to remove barriers to participation.

DOING FOR → DOING WITH
Gradient of participation

Information
An essential foundation

Consultation
Gathering opinions

Consultation
Sharing visions and expertise, exchanging arguments to develop the project

Co-construction
Collective construction of proposals

Co-decision
Negotiation, sharing decision-making power

Moving from “working for” to “working with,” the gradient of participation from CEREMA

This concept emphasizes the importance of working directly with those involved rather than deciding for them. True inclusion relies on constructive dialogue and co-creation of initiatives that meet everyone’s needs.

Overview of the situation

Persons with disabilities do not always feel recognized as citizens in their own right. They feel that their contributions are not valued by representatives of decision-making bodies. They feel that they are neither listened to nor heard. In some cases, they feel that they are being used in consultative processes that do not give them any real authority over decisions (Hudon and Tremblay, 2017). They want to be able to speak up, speak on their own behalf and learn to make their demands heard (CREMIS, 2011).

Their sense of political effectiveness, both internal and external, is inferior to that of the general population.

  • “Internal political effectiveness” means their civic competence. 
  • “External effectiveness” refers to their perception of the influence they can exert on politicians and policymakers (Schur et al., 2003).

These perceptions have a negative impact on their voter turnout, although local data on this issue are limited (Prince, 2012 – see 3.1). This lower political effectiveness is mainly due to factors external to disability, such as lower levels of education, underemployment or lower incomes. These elements limit opportunities to develop civic skills and gain experience. Thus, systemic barriers impede active citizen engagement for these individuals (Hudon and Tremblay, 2017).

To ensure their full social participation, decision-making bodies have a responsibility to integrate persons with disabilities into governance processes, consultation practices and decision-making.

Standards and obligations

There are currently no specific accessibility standards regarding public participation.

That said, in Québec, there is a related obligation in the Act to secure handicapped persons in the exercise of their rights with a view to achieving social, school and workplace integration (E-20.1). It states that it is necessary to “facilitate the autonomy of handicapped persons and their participation in individual or collective decisions that concern them and in managing the services offered to them.” This directive particularly applies to government departments, municipalities, and public and private organizations.

Good practices to strengthen citizen participation

Here are some concrete steps to enhance your action plans. Make sure you adapt them according to the specific characteristics of your organization. 

Available resources

Fact sheet prepared in collaboration with Julie-Anne Perrault, universal accessibility consultant, with feedback from Oanh Nguyen (AlterGo) and Benoit Racette.